
EVERY COUNTRY has its own unique and special character. Everywhere you go, you can see that this is so. That is the true diversity in this world, and it needs no manipulation for it is what is naturally and wonderfully there. If you want to enjoy diversity in this world, then travel from country to country and soak it in. This is the real diversity and that is how it is supposed to remain, in separate nations. For God had ensured that through His judgement after the hubristic debacle at Babel, different nations developed all over the world because of the resultant enforced Divine scattering (Genesis 11:8-9). This was deliberate on God’s part for it was designed to ensure that anything like a global confederacy in rebellion against God could not happen before its time, and it will only happen when God decides the time is right, which will be after He has taken “the Restrainer” out of the way to chime in the Endtimes (2 Thessalonians 2:6-7).
At Babel, the people had all come together in one place in a kind of ‘one-world confederation’ of different peoples to try and make a fancy ‘name for themselves’ (Genesis 11:1-4), despite having been told earlier by God to scatter across the earth (Genesis 9:7). But Man (through conscious and unconscious disobedience) has sought ways to nullify that Divine scattering through proposed global governance bodies (e.g., the United Nations) and this will ultimately issue in the actual creation of a global government under the “man of lawlessness”, the Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4,8-9; Revelation 13:2-8). But we are currently in a well-in-advance preparatory period for that.
One of the ways that the natural diversity of humanity that I mentioned above — involving different characteristics rooted in separate nations — is being undermined is through an entirely false ‘diversity’ through the deliberate importation of different peoples en masse from less developed countries into those which are more developed. People are mischievously ‘gaslit’ by governments through being told that this is to create ‘diversity’, when it is doing the exact opposite. Because when this deliberate mass importation happens (or, rather, is allowed to happen at border points), what results is huge ghettoes in a Babelish melting pot of different primitive cultures in the same locations and a resultant dilution of the character of the host nation.
This massive importation strategy serves the purpose of both diluting and polluting the original national character of those developed countries until that national character exists no more, or merely as some kind of nostalgic bit of history. For if you invite to your country hordes of people from backward cultures who breed at a much faster rate than the host nation, who have little in the way of morality, and where lying, thievery, rape, sodomy, paedophilia, hatred of women, aversion of having dogs as pets (because they prevent angels from visiting your house!), and filthy streets are the norm, and you actually give them five-star accommodation and lots of financial incentives, you are simply going to destroy your own country from within. This is basic Population Ethos 101. If governments repeatedly do this while pretending they don’t, and they are accusing anyone who rightly objects to this of being “racist” or guilty of a “hate-crime”, then they are deliberately trying to have their country destroyed from within. And this is where we are at today.
I am not speaking here about those who are genuinely seeking political asylum because their lives are at risk of death in a country with an openly repressive and murderous regime. The original idea of such “asylum” was that it had to be sought in the nearest country to one’s own rather than traipsing halfway across the world to whichever country offered you the most money and soft soap. But that apparently is not the case today.
I said above that “every country has its own unique and special character”. The unique and special character of Britain has traditionally and historically involved certain qualities (though these have considerably waned as a result of declining ethical/moral standards, increasing debauchery, the anomie promoted through social media, and also since the introduction of such a gargantuan lack of immigration control). Here are some of those unique and special qualities:
- A major tolerance of eccentrics and eccentricity. (Yay!).
- A vigorous suspicion of ‘the Establishment’, while poking satire at it (e.g., the TV series, “Yes, Minister”, or the magazine, “Private Eye”).
- A kind of nominal ‘Christianity’ which seeps through into the moral character of the nation, though that has been severely limited by the burgeoning theological liberalism and “wokeness” in the Church of England.
- An acute distaste for censorship.
- Sympathy for the underdog.
- An ethical aversion to a surveillance-state and state intrusiveness.
- A respect for individual liberty.
- An inbuilt resistance to invasion (“This Sceptred Isle” mentality).
- Mutual respect.
- Chivalry.
- Stoicism in the face of difficulties and a ‘stiff upper lip’ (i.e., not a nation of mardarses).
- Having and appreciating wry humour and ironic wit.
- Hospitality (especially in the North). In fact, Britain has a good track record for welcoming genuine asylum-seekers in the days when “political asylum” meant that a person would be killed or terribly persecuted in their own country.
- Politeness and reserve (but not doormats).
- Calling “a spade a spade” (especially in the North of England — and extra-especially in the county of Yorkshire!).
It should further be noted that as state-surveillance and government interference in people’s lives increase hugely, there is an accompanying need for the state to ensure that there will be no resistance to any of this. The “inbuilt resistance to invasion” characteristic that I mentioned above has to be overcome by them, and the best way to do that is to dilute the majority British population through a huge influx (i.e., a more subtle ‘drip-drip’ kind of invasion rather than radar-detected mass bombardments over the Cliffs of Dover) of people who do not have that inbuilt resistance because they have no investment in the national identity of the host nation. Also, in order to make compliance to government more likely, one has to remove the more stalwart, masculine characteristics of a nation. So they hard-sell anything which militates against male leadership and masculine sexuality. It is not hard to tell what ‘movements’ or so-called ‘communities’ in a society achieve that most successfully. Feminism, “camp” culture, and “trans” ideology are productive starting points.
Now, you may ask how does all this get implemented? Where does the impetus for the propulsive actions come from? Anyone who has looked into how governance operates can see that governments themselves do not originate these actions. They are dictated to them somehow from the power-elite which really runs the show. This is why all governments have been powerless to stem the tide, no matter what claims they have made about doing so. The tide just continues regardless. Governments are just the pawns with the electorate being the patsies who are convinced they are choosing their governments. This is why so-called “democracy” is a sham. Successive governments have made empty promises about reducing mass immigration yet those reductions are never implemented while the influx remains massive. This is because there are forces in whose interests it is to destroy national character and make the whole developed world into a melting pot of false enforced emasculated pseudo-diversity. Such a national society will be infinitely easier to manipulate, subdue and thereby able to be made part of a superstate or global government.
Unfortunately, there is very little that one can do to prevent the direction in which all this is heading. We have seen that when crimes occur which have been committed by those who are part of the massive influx from less developed countries, riots are then invoked by, I believe, agents provocateurs, such as the Israel-funded rabble-rouser, Tommy Robinson, who went on an all-expenses paid visit by invitation from the state to Israel in October 2025 and who is funded by numerous Zionist organisations) so that it all inevitably turns into a full-on xenophobic “all foreign scum OUT” racist rally complete with the burning down of local houses in which any genuinely integrated immigrants happen to live, even if they have been in the country for years running a corner shop! All of which results in draconian policing with the rioters labelled as “far-right agitators” and “racist thugs” and one can somehow understand why. Essentially, rioting is counterproductive and will always be unsuccessful as one is walking into a ‘controlled opposition’ trap. Aggression and violence should never have any part to play when one wants to make a stand for truth; and this should especially be so with good Christian people who operate in the world of honest ideas rather than bellicose fisticuffs. Too many people have failed to realise that “V for Vendetta” is just a fictional film and not a documentary.
Thus, any individual who tries to make a sound, intelligent, cohesive case against this emasculated, national-character-diluted (or, rather, nullified), ‘melting pot’ kind of society — which is based on the false ‘leftie’-idea of so-called “diversity” and inevitably issues in a deteriorating culture — will be labelled as being “racist”, of the “far right”, and could potentially be deemed to be guilty of a punishable ‘hatecrime’. The real reason that one will be unable to change this deteriorating situation is because all governments have to follow it and it is all leading up to the annulment of national powers and the implementation of a global government which will have a tight grip on society through massive surveillance, colossal data-control, and the use of artificial intelligence — not to mention the complementary and decidedly sinister development of Transhumanism. This grand movement towards global domination by a totalitarian satanic autocracy is prophecy in action and it is all in the process of unfolding now in its infancy.
Please always remember that we cannot make this fallen world into anything remotely resembling a utopia. This has been the huge mistake of the “Seven Mountain Mandate”-influenced “Christian Right” in the USA, which foolishly and falsely imagines it can enforce a squeaky-clean world in preparation for the return of Christ. The movement of history is inevitably and unavoidably heading for an anti-Christian planetary totalitarianism. So ‘buckle-up, buttercup’! The only positive action that anyone can take concerns the salvation of their souls, getting themselves right with God, asking Him to bring you into His family and thereby under His protection, to remove the penalty of your sins, all through the saving power of the atonement of Christ, who knew all this evil was coming when He referred to its ultimate manifestation in the Antichrist as the “Abomination of Desolation” — a recurring desecration of God’s exclusive right to reign which will be contemporaneous with a time of great tribulation in which all the saints will bear the brunt of anti-Christ hatred (Matthew 24:15-35).
If this seems like a pessimistic view of future societal development, it is simply the biblical view of the climax of evil in history as the precursor to the intervention of Christ returning in judgement to resurrect the saints and then place them in a new creation in which “there will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the former things [will] have passed away” (Revelation 21:4). But that is some considerable way off yet. So our primary purpose is to put what is happening in a biblical perspective and inform the world of where the real hope lies, far beyond any artificially-created society suited to facilitate the ‘spirit of the Antichrist’. Then, instead of becoming manipulated riotous puppets, we will be using the occasion to beautifully gather souls into the true kingdom, which is “not of this world” and over which Jesus reigns.
.
.
.
© Copyright, Alan Morrison, 2026
[The copyright on my works is merely to protect them from any wanton plagiarism which could result in undesirable changes (as has actually happened!). Readers are free to reproduce my work, so long as it is in the same format and with the exact same content and its origin is acknowledged]
.
